Gamma is a fast and intuitive AI tool for creating slide decks from prompts - which makes it a great way to beat the blank page. But for many teams, that’s not quite enough.

‍

You may want more design control, deeper integrations, or simply a better way to personalize your content. 

‍

In 2025, the market is full of tools that do what Gamma does - and then some. Whether you want CRM-driven personalization, deeper analytics, stronger integrations, or brand-safe collaboration, this list will help you find the right Gamma alternative for your workflow.

‍

Let’s dive in. 

The best Gamma alternatives

All right, so let’s take a closer look at the top alternatives to Gamma, what they’re best at, and how they stack up depending on your goals.

1. Storydoc

Who it’s best for: Business professionals and teams who create sales, marketing, or investor presentations and want them to be highly engaging and tailor-made to convert. Storydoc works great for sales decks, client proposals, and investor pitch decks - especially when you want to track engagement, drive next steps directly from the deck, and scale deck creation fast.

‍

Storydoc helps teams turn static presentations into interactive, scroll-based business documents that look and feel like modern web pages. Its AI assistant (StoryBrain) can be trained on your brand, website, and messaging to generate on-brand content that’s designed to convert. With CRM and Zapier integrations, Storydoc makes it easy to personalize at scale and track what happens after you hit send - down to the slide.

‍

How it compares to Gamma:

• Buyer engagement: Gamma helps you generate slides quickly. Storydoc goes further by turning your deck into a scroll-based business document that feels like a landing page - complete with embedded video, ROI calculators, and forms. It’s built to hold attention and drive next steps, not just deliver a message.
• Personalization at scale: While Gamma creates general-purpose decks from prompts, Storydoc pulls in live CRM data and dynamic variables to personalize proposals automatically. It's ideal for outbound and ABM teams that want every recipient to feel like the deck was made just for them.
• Analytics: Gamma offers minimal insight after you send. With Storydoc, you get real-time engagement data - heatmaps, scroll depth, time on page - so you know exactly which parts resonate and when to follow up.
• Integrations: Storydoc connects directly to CRMs like Salesforce and HubSpot, plus 3,000+ apps via Zapier. You can auto-generate personalized decks, trigger them from workflows, and track engagement - all without leaving your existing tools.

‍

Things to watch out for:

If your team still relies on live, slide-by-slide presenting or printable decks, adapting to Storydoc’s scroll-based format may take a shift in habits - but for external-facing content, it’s a shift worth making.

‍

Final take:

Storydoc is the strongest Gamma alternative for teams who care about speed and substance. It doesn’t just help you generate content faster, it helps you create smarter presentations that drive engagement, personalize at scale, and actually move the deal forward.

‍

2. Pitch

Who it’s best for: Teams that work collaboratively on slide decks and value speed, consistency, and co-editing. Pitch is particularly useful for internal presentations or recurring updates.

‍

Pitch is a modern alternative to PowerPoint or Google Slides, with an intuitive editor and real-time collaboration built in. It helps teams move fast without sacrificing visual quality. It gives you the tools to build a professional presentation quickly - especially when multiple people are contributing.

‍

How it compares to Gamma:

• Collaboration: Gamma supports real-time editing and comments, but Pitch is built specifically for teams. You can assign slides, leave feedback, and track progress with slide status labels - making it easier to manage shared decks without version headaches.
• Design consistency: Pitch gives you more layout control and better brand governance. Where Gamma sometimes recycles layouts or outputs inconsistent visuals, Pitch offers templates and brand presets that make professional decks easy to maintain.
• Interactivity: While Pitch supports rich embeds like videos, charts, and forms, it’s still a traditional slide-based format at its core. Gamma outputs more like web pages, allowing for lightweight interactivity, but neither tool is built for high-engagement experiences.
• AI support: Gamma focuses on end-to-end AI deck creation. Pitch takes a lighter, more assistive approach. Its AI can generate drafts, rewrite copy, adjust tone, and suggest imagery - but you're still in charge of the overall story.

‍

Things to watch out for:

Pitch wasn’t built for interactivity - it’s focused on team collaboration, not driving business outcomes. At its core, it’s still a dressed-up PowerPoint, which limits its impact for outbound sales, proposals, or anything that needs to engage viewers beyond the slides.

‍

Final take:

Pitch is a great fit if your team works on decks together and wants a clean, fast alternative to PowerPoint or Slides. Just keep in mind it’s not built to personalize at scale or keep buyers engaged - for that, other tools on this list offer more.

‍

3. Qwilr

Who it’s best for: Modern sales teams who want their proposals to feel more like mini-websites. Qwilr is particularly strong for one-off, client-facing decks where visual impact matters more than scale or deep customization.

‍

Qwilr turns presentations into clean, scrollable web pages with embedded video, pricing tables, and e-signatures. It’s ideal for making a strong impression and giving prospects something professional and easy to explore - though it’s more about aesthetics than sales strategy or automation.

‍

How it compares to Gamma:

• Format and output: Gamma creates presentations or scrollable web docs; Qwilr produces single-page web proposals. If you need something clients can sign, pay for, or interact with directly, Qwilr is purpose-built for that.
• Interactivity: Gamma allows for basic embeds and light interactivity, but Qwilr goes further with built-in pricing tables, e-signatures, and payment blocks.
• AI support: Gamma leans into full deck generation from prompts. Qwilr also offers an AI proposal creator to kickstart content and structure, but it’s more focused on proposals than on creating complete narrative decks.
• Ease of use: Both are user-friendly, but Qwilr’s editor is more guided - drop in content blocks, and the platform handles design. Great for speed, but limits flexibility if you want to break the layout.

‍

Things to watch out for:

Qwilr’s strength is in design - but it can feel limiting if you want full control over layout, branding, or content structure. It’s also geared more toward the bottom of the funnel, which means it’s not a complete solution for teams that need broader content workflows or top-of-funnel engagement.

‍

Final take:

Qwilr is a great choice if you want to impress visually and send a proposal that feels more modern than a PDF. But if you need to personalize quickly or scale your presentation efforts across sales and marketing - other tools offer more flexibility.

‍

4. Canva

Who it’s best for: General business users, marketers, and content creators who want to build visually sleek presentations quickly - without relying on a design team. Canva is especially popular for internal decks, branded templates, and lightweight business collateral.

‍

Canva is an all-purpose design platform, and presentations are just one part of its offering. It’s easy to use, visually appealing, and widely adopted - which makes it a go-to for many non-designers. But when it comes to sales-ready presentations or personalized decks with trackable engagement, it’s missing some key features.

‍

How it compares to Gamma:

• Design flexibility: Canva offers far more control than Gamma when it comes to visuals. You can fully customize layouts, colors, fonts, and add animations or transitions - something Gamma currently limits with its auto-generated format.
• Templates & content variety: Canva has an extensive library of presentation templates across industries and use cases. You won’t get AI-written content out of the box like Gamma, but you will get a huge head start on structure and design.
• Collaboration: Canva supports team folders, shared templates, and basic commenting - which makes it workable for simple collaboration. That being said, it’s not purpose-built for version control, permissions, or approval flows like some of the more specialized tools.
• Presentation vs. conversion: Canva is great for visuals, but not built for outcomes. There’s no CRM personalization, no interactive elements beyond animations, and no real engagement analytics.

‍

Things to watch out for:

Because Canva tries to be everything for everyone, its presentation builder lacks the depth of tools that focus specifically on business or sales use. It’s a great visual tool - but not a strategic one when it comes to data, personalization, or post-send performance.

‍

Final take:

If you want your presentations to look professional and on-brand with minimal effort, Canva is a great choice - especially for internal decks or marketing materials. But if your presentations are meant to persuade, convert, or move deals forward, there are better alternatives built for that job.

‍

5. Beautiful.ai

Who it’s best for:

Users who need quick, visually consistent slides for internal updates or recurring reports - but don’t expect much beyond surface-level aesthetics. Beautiful.ai works best when you need to make something “look nice” without spending time on design, and when interactivity or deeper functionality isn’t required.

‍

Beautiful.ai helps you build traditional slide decks that follow clean design rules - but with heavy constraints. Its Smart Slides system forces content into rigid layouts that keep things neat, but often at the cost of flexibility and relevance. While this may save time, the result can feel like a dressed-up PowerPoint template with limited depth. 

‍

It’s fine for teams that care about brand consistency and speed - but not for sales, where flexibility, interactivity, and content personalization matter.

‍

How it compares to Gamma:

• AI features: Both tools use AI to build full decks if you want. Beautiful.ai also offers Smart Slides that auto-format your content. That being said, you wouldn’t know it’s AI-powered just by looking at the examples on their site - they feel more like standard PPT templates than something intelligently generated.
• Design consistency: This is where Beautiful.ai shines - and stalls. Every layout is locked into design “best practices,” which helps non-designers stay on brand, but it limits creative options. Gamma gives you less visual consistency, but more room to express ideas that don’t fit a narrow mold.
• Integrations: Gamma’s native integrations aren’t geared toward sales - if you want it to work with your CRM or other sales tools, you’ll need to go through Zapier. Beautiful.ai isn’t much better: its list of integrations is short and fairly limited, especially compared to platforms built for sales teams. 
• Interactivity & personalization: Beautiful.ai is limited to static slides. You won’t find dynamic variables or embedded forms. Compared to other tools, there’s no way to tailor content at scale or make your deck feel like a live experience. Gamma does a better job here, as it supports embeds and other interactive elements.

‍

Things to watch out for:

It’s a solid tool for making your deck look good, but it stops there. There’s no support for sales workflows, no way to personalize at scale, and no visibility into what happens after your deck is sent if you export it as a JPG or a PPT.

‍

Final take:

Beautiful.ai is great if your goal is to build clean, consistent slides fast - especially for internal or one-off use. But for client-facing content that needs to convert, engage, or track performance, you’ll quickly run into limitations.

‍

So, which Gamma alternative should you choose?

It depends on what kind of presentations you’re creating - and what your team actually needs beyond a fast first draft. Here’s a simple breakdown:

• Choose Storydoc if you want interactive, personalized business presentations that are built to convert. It’s the best choice for sales, marketing, and investor decks that need to drive action and scale across your team.
• Choose Pitch if you want a clean, fast alternative to PowerPoint that makes collaboration easy - and you're happy building a lot of the content yourself.
• Choose Qwilr if you want to send professional, one-off proposals that feel more like a web page, and don’t mind getting another tool for top-of-funnel content.
• Choose Canva if your priority is design and you’re already using it for social posts, brochures, or internal materials.
• Choose Beautiful.ai if you want classic slides and the option to export your deck as a JPG or PPT, but don’t need interactivity or personalization.

‍

Choose the right tool for the work you do

Gamma is a great starting point - but most teams quickly outgrow it once they start looking for better engagement, more control, or deeper insights.

‍

Whether you’re pitching investors, sending client proposals, or building outbound sales decks, the best Gamma alternative is the one that helps your team go beyond static slides - and actually move the conversation forward.

‍

So take a step back and consider your use case, your workflow, and how far you want your presentations to take you. The right tool won’t just help you build faster - it’ll help you impress more clients, close more deals, and scale with your team as you grow.

‍